Look For Taken From Me The Tiffany Rubin Story @ Amazon.com
|
These days, a heap of humans take wedding bands and engagement rings for granted, and altho they give these pretty items of jewellery with integrity and love, they are many times given with no real psychological result of perception learning and reasoning of the meaning behind them. Both wedding bands and engagement rings are very particular items of jewellery; in fact, they are more than just jewellery – they are the symbols of a lot of emotions and promises such as:
But where – and why – did these standard and sentimental pieces of jewellery stem from? The History Of Wedding Bands These items of jewellery have a history that spans numerous centuries and passes through a good deal of countries from all around the planet. Below, you will find a brief history of the wedding and engagement ring, as reported from country to country. EGYPTIANS The now-famous wedding band is thought to have originated in Ancient Egypt, where it is said that plant subsections were fashioned in to circles to signify never-ending and immortal love. It was thought that the fourth finger (which we now recognise as the ring finger) contained a special vein that was connected directly to the heart, and accordingly this became the official finger for the wedding band. ROMANS The Romans likewise consorted with the Egyptians with regards to the wedding ring finger and it is meaning, but rather than providing wedding bands as a symbol of love, they awarded them as a symbol of ownership. Roman men would “claim” their woman with the giving of a ring. ASIANS / ARABS Puzzle rings were a complex type of jewellery that were once general in Asia, and these jewels had the charming knack of being capable to fall apart and put back together again – if you knew how to do this, of course. Wealthy Middle Eastern men then begun to use these rings as wedding bands for their wives, who were ofttimes forced to wear a puzzle ring when their husband was away. The husband would recognise upon his return whether any of his wives had been disloyal by removing the ring whilst he was away, because the ring was designed to collapse upon remotion and could only be put together again if you had the skill and cognition required. EUROPEANS Several centuries ago, the Europeans became rather taken with what we would class as an engagement ring, but was then called a Poesy Ring. This ring was given to a loved one as a form of promise, and signified fidelity and love. The Poesy Ring was offered as a pledge of eternal togetherness, much as today’s engagement rings are offered as a promise of eternal marriage. AMERICANS During Colonial times, all items of jewellery in America were prohibited due to their evident moral worthlessness. Instead, a more practical thimble was given as a token of love and as a pledge of eternal togetherness. However, after they were married, the women tended to remove the bottom of their “engagement thimble” to form a type of ring. History Of Engagement Rings The engagement ring of today likewise has it is own varied and interesting history, a heap of of which is explored below. Engagement rings have been known by some dissimilar names, have symbolised a potpourri of dissimilar things and have not always been made of cherished metals and stunning gems! GREEKS The ancient Greeks are thought to have been the forerunners in the rising of the traditionalisti engagement ring. Given as a token of care and affection, the rings employed by the Greeks were known as betrothal rings and were given before marriage. However, the giving of these rings was not always a pre-requisite to marriage and was often given in the same way as a friendship ring might be given today. ROMANS As seen by their use of the wedding ring, ancient Romans weren’t the most sentimental of people, and the early version of their “engagement ring” were thought to have carved keys on them. It has been debated that this could have been to symbolise the woman’s right to access and own half of everything following marriage. However, the more sentimental like to think that the key may have been a key to her husband’s heart. ROYALTY AND THE AFFLUENT Engagement rings as we know them today – stunning gems encased in precious metals – became standard in around the fourteenth or fifteenth century, when the affluent and the royals begun to interchange and wear these jewels. However, these items were so costly that not anyone other than the royals and the rich could afford to interchange them. It was to be galore centuries before these engagement rings would become more ordinary or traditional. Why a ring? The intent of engagement rings and wedding bands is to convey deep emotions of eternal love, eternal happiness, eternal commitment, and eternal togetherness. In fact, these rings signify eternity – amid the giver and the recipient. A ring, of course, is a finish circle with no break and no end or beginning, which means that it just goes on and on – it is eternal. And, since folklore has it that the fourth finger of the left hand has a vein leading directly to the heart, it is only natural that both engagement and wedding rings would be worn on this queer finger, which was once reputed to be a direct route to the heart. Summary In short, it is clear that the giving of a ring in honour of a union, betrothal, and marriage has been going on since ancient times, and though it may not always have been as glamorous and romantic as it is today, it was still a way of substituting a contract of betrothal or marriage. Thankfully, today’s wedding bands and engagement rings are not made of hair, grass, plants or twine as they may have been in ancient times, but of finelooking metals set with stunning gems, such as platinum, titanium, white gold, gold, sapphires, diamonds, rubies and emeralds. These unbelievable items of jewellery are likely to stay as usual as ever as the centuries go by, and even as the rest of the world advances in to a futuristic and technical age, it’s hard to imagine a day where a gorgeous diamond engagement ring doesn’t melt the heart of it is recipient. Most helpful customer reviews 35 of 35 people found the following review helpful. The wonderful Taraji P. Henson portrays Rubin. After her ex-husband takes their son for a week long vacation, Rubin becomes alarmed when they seem to fall off the face of the earth. Soon, it is discovered that the pair have fled the country. There seems to be little chance of Rubin even finding her son, much less bringing him home again–and, as you might expect, this is devastating for Rubin and her family. In a grounded story of mother love and perseverance, the boy is located and Rubin is determined that he should be brought home even if that brands her an international criminal. The film adds a couple of unnecessary thriller elements to the concluding chapter for dramatic purposes, but never loses sight of its true strength–it has created real characters that you actually care about! Henson, as I mentioned, is perfect. Strong, believable, and utterly real–I’m putting it out there, I think Henson should be on the shortlist for Emmy nomination consideration. This could have been so hyper-dramatic, histrionic, and overblown–but it remains solidly rooted by natural performances. Beverly Todd as Rubin’s mother, David Jones as her current husband, and Terry O’Quinn who specializes in finding missing children are all fantastic–but this is Henson’s show! In the end, it’s hard not to be moved by this dramatic recreation. With the statistics of custodial kidnappings on the rise, this film expertly highlights one singular case. Solidly satisfying, a definite recommendation. KGHarris, 3/11. 10 of 11 people found the following review helpful. 5 of 5 people found the following review helpful. |





